|
|
Bridge Measurement Systems for Transportation Agency Decision Making
Book Code: SYH397
|
Year: 2009
Pages: 126
ISBN: 978-0-309-09835-9
|
|
|
The objective of this synthesis study has been to gather information on current practices
that agency chief executive officers and senior managers use to make network-level investment
and resource allocation decisions for their bridge programs, and to understand how
they apply their agencys bridge management capabilities to support these decisions. The
following areas of planning, programming, and performance-based decision making have
been addressed:
Condition and performance measures that are used to define policy goals and performance
targets for the bridge program
Methods of establishing funding levels and identifying bridge needs
Methods and organizational responsibilities for resource allocation between the
bridge program versus competing needs in other programs (pavement, safety, etc.)
Methods of allocation among districts and selection and prioritization of projects
The role of automated bridge management systems (BMS) in planning, programming,
resource allocation, and budgeting
Use of economic methods in bridge management
Methods to promote accountability and communication of the status of the bridge
inventory and the bridge program.
The study has also considered recent trends and events that could influence future
bridge program management. Several state departments of transportation (DOTs) that
were interviewed for this study described ongoing, leading-edge enhancements of their
bridge management processes and systems that provide examples for other agencies to
apply in the future. The increasing application of asset management principles among state
DOTs is another such influence, encompassing bridges, pavements, and a growing set of
other transportation assets. Several actions following the collapse of the I-35W bridge in
Minneapolis in August 2007 also promise to reshape bridge management practices in the
future, with increasing emphasis on program performance, federal oversight and accountability,
inspection qualifications and procedures, use of innovative inspection technology,
and research needs to improve BMSs, procedures, and technology.
|
|
|
|